Müller, Amrei
자료유형 | 단행본 |
---|---|
개인저자 | Müller, Amrei Müller, Amrei, editor. Kjos, Hege Elisabeth, editor. |
서명/저자사항 | Judicial dialogue and human rights:edited by Amrei Müller ; (in collaboration with Hege Elisabeth Kjos). |
발행사항 | 2017. |
형태사항 | 1 online resource. |
ISBN | 9781316809112 1316809110 9781316780237 1316780236 |
서지주기 | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
내용주기 | Cover; Half-title; Series information; Title page; Copyright information; Table of contents; List of contributors; Table of Cases; International; International Court of Justice; International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia Cases; UN Committee against Torture; UN Human Rights Committee; Regional; Court of Justice of the European Union; European Court of Human Rights; Inter- American Court of Human Rights; National; Argentina; Australia; Austria; Bolivia; Brazil; Canada; Chile; Colombia; Czech Republic; Finland; France; Germany; Hungary; Israel; Italy; Lithuania; New Zealand NigeriaParaguay; Peru; Poland; Russia; Slovakia; Spain; Sweden; The Netherlands; Ukraine; United Kingdom; Uruguay; USA; Venezuela; Table of Conventions and Statutes; Acknowledgements; List of abbreviations; 1 Introduction; 1.1 Background; 1.2 Framework; 1.2.1 The Concept of Judicial Dialogue; 1.2.2 Extent; 1.2.3 Method; 1.2.4 Purpose; 1.2.5 Effects; 1.3 Methods Used to Study Judicial Dialogue; 1.4 Outline; Part I Judicial Dialogue in Domestic Courts; 2 Judicial Dialogue on International Human Rights Law in Poland and Eastern Europe; 2.1 Introduction 2.2 The Extent of Polish Courts' Engagement in Judicial Dialogue on Human Rights2.2.1 The Legal Context of Judicial Dialogue: The Position of International Law in the Polish Legal Order; 2.2.2 Polish Courts' References to the Case Law of the ECtHR; 2.2.3 Polish Courts' References to the Jurisprudence of the CJEU; 2.2.4 Polish Courts' Engagement with Jurisprudence of Foreign Domestic Courts; 2.2.5 General Observations on the Extent of Polish Courts' References to International and Foreign Jurisprudence; 2.3 The Method of Polish Courts' Engagement in Judicial Dialogue 2.4 Purpose and Effects of Polish Courts' Engagement in Judicial Dialogue on Human Rights2.4.1 Dialogue with the Purpose to Legitimise the Transition Process; 2.4.2 Ensuring Interpretation of National Law Consistent with International Human Rights Standards; 2.4.3 Polish Courts' Dialogue with the Purpose to Solve 'Difficult' Cases; 2.4.4 Polish Courts' Dialogue with the Purpose of Widening the Competences of a Particular Domestic Court; 2.4.5 References to International and Foreign Judgments with the Purpose to Justify a Particular Domestic Solution; 2.5 Concluding Remarks 3 Horizontal Judicial Dialogue on Human Rights3.1 Introduction; 3.2 Judicial Dialogue and Constitutional Evolution in South America; 3.3 The Extent of Judicial Dialogue in South American Courts; 3.3.1 The Frequency of Judicial Dialogue; 3.3.2 The Evolution of Judicial Dialogue; 3.3.3 Judicial Dialogue in Majority Judgments and Minority Opinions; 3.3.4 The Correlation between Specific Rights and the Extent of Judicial Dialogue; 3.3.5 The Most Cited Jurisdictions; 3.4 The Method of Transnational Judicial Dialogue in South America; 3.5 The Purpose of Judicial Dialogue for South American Courts |
요약 | A comprehensive analysis of the extent, method, purpose and effects of domestic and international courts' judicial dialogue on human rights. |
일반주제명 | International human rights courts. Human rights. Communication in law. Judicial process. Communication in law. Human rights. International human rights courts. Judicial process. LAW / Constitutional LAW / Public |
바로가기 | URL |
서평 (0 건)
*주제와 무관한 내용의 서평은 삭제될 수 있습니다.
서평추가