상세정보
- 상세정보
The paradox of gender equality :how American women's groups gained and lost their public voice
Goss, Kristin A.
- 책이미지
-
- 도서 상세정보
| 자료유형 | e-Book |
|---|---|
| 개인저자 | Goss, Kristin A., 1965-, author. |
| 서명/저자사항 | The paradox of gender equality :how American women's groups gained and lost their public voice :Kristin A. Goss. |
| 형태사항 | 1 online resource (xiii, 240 pages) :illustrations. |
| 총서사항 | CAWP series in gender and American politics. |
| 총서부출표목 | CAWP series in gender and American politics. |
| 기타형태 저록 | Print version Goss, Kristin A., 1965- Paradox of gender equality Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, c2013, 9780472118519 |
| ISBN | 9780472028733 (electronic bk.) 0472028731 (electronic bk.) |
| 서지주기 | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
| 내용주기 | Women's citizenship and American democracy -- Suffrage and the rise of women's policy advocacy -- The second wave surges "and then" -- From public interest to "special interests" -- Sameness, difference, and women's civic place -- What drove the changes? the not-so-easy answers -- How public policy shaped women's civic place -- Women, citizenship, and public policy in the 21st century. |
| 요약 | "Drawing on original research, Kristin A. Goss examines how women's civic place has changed over the span of more than 120 years, how public policy has driven these changes, and why these changes matter for women and American democracy. Suffrage, which granted women the right to vote and invited their democratic participation, provided a dual platform for the expansion of women's policy agendas. As measured by women's groups' appearances before the U.S. Congress, women's collective political engagement continued to grow between 1920 and 1960 - when many conventional accounts claim it declined - and declined after 1980, when it might have been expected to grow. This waxing and waning was accompanied by major shifts in issue agendas, from broad public interests to narrow feminist interests. Goss suggests that ascriptive differences are not necessarily barriers to disadvantaged groups' capacity to be heard; that enhanced political inclusion does not necessarily lead to greater collective engagement; and that rights movements do not necessarily constitute the best way to understand the political participation of marginalized groups. She asks what women have gained - and perhaps lost - through expanded incorporation as well as whether single-sex organizations continue to matter in 21st-century America"--Book jacket. |
| 일반주제명 | Women -- Political activity -- United States. Women's rights -- United States. Women -- Suffrage -- United States. Political participation -- United States. Democracy -- United States. POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Freedom & Security / Civil Rights POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Freedom & Security / Human Rights Democracy Political participation Women -- Political activity Women -- Suffrage Women's rights |
| 주제명(지명) | United Statesfast |
| 바로가기 | URL |
-
- 내 안의 차별주의자 : 보통 사람들의 욕망에 숨어든 ...
- 라우라 비스뵈크 지음
- 심플라이프, 2020
-
- 노동조합 및 노동관계조정법 주해 . 1-3
- 노동법실무연구회 지음
- 박영사, 2023
-
- 나는 조선사람입니다 [비디오 녹화자료] = I am...
- 김철민 감독
- 비디오여행, 2023
-
- 우리가 우리를 우리라고 부를 때 : N번방 추적기와 ...
- 추적단 불꽃
- 이봄, 2020
-
- 온전히 평등하고 지극히 차별적인 : 몸을 위한 변론 :...
- 김원영
- 문학동네, 2024
서평 (0 건)
*주제와 무관한 내용의 서평은 삭제될 수 있습니다.
서평추가