상세정보

  • HOME
  • 상세정보

The paradox of gender equality :how American women's groups gained and lost their public voice

Goss, Kristin A.

책이미지
The paradox of gender equality :how American women's groups gained and lost their public voice 표지이미지
도서 상세정보
서지사항정보
자료유형e-Book
개인저자Goss, Kristin A., 1965-, author.
서명/저자사항The paradox of gender equality :how American women's groups gained and lost their public voice :Kristin A. Goss.
형태사항1 online resource (xiii, 240 pages) :illustrations.
총서사항CAWP series in gender and American politics.
총서부출표목CAWP series in gender and American politics.
기타형태 저록Print version Goss, Kristin A., 1965- Paradox of gender equality Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, c2013, 9780472118519
ISBN9780472028733 (electronic bk.)
0472028731 (electronic bk.)


서지주기Includes bibliographical references and index.
내용주기Women's citizenship and American democracy -- Suffrage and the rise of women's policy advocacy -- The second wave surges "and then" -- From public interest to "special interests" -- Sameness, difference, and women's civic place -- What drove the changes? the not-so-easy answers -- How public policy shaped women's civic place -- Women, citizenship, and public policy in the 21st century.
요약"Drawing on original research, Kristin A. Goss examines how women's civic place has changed over the span of more than 120 years, how public policy has driven these changes, and why these changes matter for women and American democracy. Suffrage, which granted women the right to vote and invited their democratic participation, provided a dual platform for the expansion of women's policy agendas. As measured by women's groups' appearances before the U.S. Congress, women's collective political engagement continued to grow between 1920 and 1960 - when many conventional accounts claim it declined - and declined after 1980, when it might have been expected to grow. This waxing and waning was accompanied by major shifts in issue agendas, from broad public interests to narrow feminist interests. Goss suggests that ascriptive differences are not necessarily barriers to disadvantaged groups' capacity to be heard; that enhanced political inclusion does not necessarily lead to greater collective engagement; and that rights movements do not necessarily constitute the best way to understand the political participation of marginalized groups. She asks what women have gained - and perhaps lost - through expanded incorporation as well as whether single-sex organizations continue to matter in 21st-century America"--Book jacket.
일반주제명Women -- Political activity -- United States.
Women's rights -- United States.
Women -- Suffrage -- United States.
Political participation -- United States.
Democracy -- United States.
POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Freedom & Security / Civil Rights
POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Freedom & Security / Human Rights
Democracy
Political participation
Women -- Political activity
Women -- Suffrage
Women's rights
주제명(지명)United Statesfast
바로가기URL
  • (역사와 쟁점으로 살펴보는) 한국의 병역제도
    (역사와 쟁점으로 살펴보는) 한국의 병역제도
    김신숙 지음
    메디치미디어, 2020
  • (주석) 형사소송법 .1-4
    (주석) 형사소송법 .1-4
    김희옥
    韓國司法行政學會, 2017
  • 한국 병역정책의 바람직한 진로 /
    한국 병역정책의 바람직한 진로 /
    정주성 ;정원영
    한국국방연구원,, 2003
  • 사람이 사는 미술관
    사람이 사는 미술관
    박민경 지음
    그래도봄, 2023
  • 주석 형법 :  총칙 . 1-2
    주석 형법 : 총칙 . 1-2
    박상옥
    韓國司法行政學會, 2020


*주제와 무관한 내용의 서평은 삭제될 수 있습니다.

서평추가

서평추가
별점
총 5점중 별0점
  • 총 5점중 별5점
  • 총 5점중 별4.5점
  • 총 5점중 별4점
  • 총 5점중 별3.5점
  • 총 5점중 별3점
  • 총 5점중 별2.5점
  • 총 5점중 별2점
  • 총 5점중 별1.5점
  • 총 5점중 별1점
  • 총 5점중 별0.5점
  • 총 5점중 별0점