상세정보
- 상세정보
Nothing to hide:the false tradeoff between privacy and security
Solove, Daniel J
- 책이미지
-
- 도서 상세정보
| 자료유형 | 단행본 |
|---|---|
| 개인저자 | Solove, Daniel J., 1972- |
| 서명/저자사항 | Nothing to hide::the false tradeoff between privacy and security :Daniel J. Solove. |
| 발행사항 | New Haven [Conn.] ;London:Yale University Press,c2011. |
| 형태사항 | ix, 245 p. :ill. ;25 cm. |
| ISBN | 9780300172317 (cloth : alk. paper) 0300172311 (cloth : alk. paper) |
| 서지주기 | Includes bibliographical references (p. 211-235) and index. |
| 일반주제명 | Privacy, Right of -- United States. Law enforcement -- United States. National security -- Law and legislation -- United States. |
- 서비스 이용안내
-
택배대출 신청
청구기호 프린터 선택
| No. | 등록번호 | 청구기호 | 소장처 | 도서상태 | 반납예정일 | 예약 | 서비스 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WM6331 | 342.7308 S689n | 인권도서관/인권도서관/ | 대출가능 |
|
목차 일부
-- The nothing-to-hide argument
-- The all-or-nothing fallacy
-- The danger of deference
-- Why privacy isn't merely an individual right
-- The pendulum argument
-- The national-security arg...
-- The all-or-nothing fallacy
-- The danger of deference
-- Why privacy isn't merely an individual right
-- The pendulum argument
-- The national-security arg...
목차 전체
-- The nothing-to-hide argument
-- The all-or-nothing fallacy
-- The danger of deference
-- Why privacy isn't merely an individual right
-- The pendulum argument
-- The national-security argument
-- The problem with dissolving the crime-espionage distinction
-- The war-powers argument and the rule of law
-- The Fourth Amendment and the secrecy paradigm
-- The third party doctrine and digital dossiers
-- The failure of looking for a reasonable expectation of privacy
-- The suspicionless-searches argument
-- Should we keep the exclusionary rule?
-- The first amendment as criminal procedure
-- Will repealing the Patriot Act restore our privacy?
-- The law-and-technology problem and the leave-it-to-the-legislature argument
-- Video surveillance and the no-privacy-in-public argument
-- Should the government engage in data mining?
-- The Luddite argument, the Titanic phenomenon, and the fix-a-problem strategy.
-- The all-or-nothing fallacy
-- The danger of deference
-- Why privacy isn't merely an individual right
-- The pendulum argument
-- The national-security argument
-- The problem with dissolving the crime-espionage distinction
-- The war-powers argument and the rule of law
-- The Fourth Amendment and the secrecy paradigm
-- The third party doctrine and digital dossiers
-- The failure of looking for a reasonable expectation of privacy
-- The suspicionless-searches argument
-- Should we keep the exclusionary rule?
-- The first amendment as criminal procedure
-- Will repealing the Patriot Act restore our privacy?
-- The law-and-technology problem and the leave-it-to-the-legislature argument
-- Video surveillance and the no-privacy-in-public argument
-- Should the government engage in data mining?
-- The Luddite argument, the Titanic phenomenon, and the fix-a-problem strategy.
-
- 사람이 사는 미술관
- 박민경 지음
- 그래도봄, 2023
-
- 인권이란 무엇인가
- 새뮤얼 모인 지음;공민희 옮김
- 북이십일 21세기북스, 2011
-
- 인권도 차별이 되나요? : '나는 괜찮다'고 여겼던 당...
- 구정우
- 북스톤, 2019
-
- (주석) 형사소송법 .1-4
- 김희옥
- 韓國司法行政學會, 2017
-
- 50이면 육아가 끝날 줄 알았다 : 부모와 성인 자녀...
- Steinberg, Laurence D
- 저녁달, 2024
서평 (0 건)
*주제와 무관한 내용의 서평은 삭제될 수 있습니다.
서평추가