상세정보
- 상세정보
Indirect discrimination :
Tobler, Christa
- 책이미지
-
- 도서 상세정보
| 자료유형 | 단행본 |
|---|---|
| 개인저자 | Tobler, Christa. |
| 서명/저자사항 | Indirect discrimination :a case study into the development of the legal concept of indirect discrimination under EC law:Christa Tobler. |
| 발행사항 | Antwerpen :Intersentia,c2005. |
| 형태사항 | xxiv, 515p ;24cm. |
| 총서사항 | Social Europe series;10 |
| ISBN | 9050954588 (pbk.) |
| 일반주기 | "An updated and restructured version of a habilitation thesis submitted in the summer of 2003 to the Law Faculty of the University of Basel, Switzerland."--P. vii. |
| 서지주기 | Includes bibliographical references, bibliography (p. 457-507), and index. |
| 일반주제명 | Discrimination -- Law and legislation -- Europe Union countries. Equality before the law -- European Union countries. Discrimination -- Law and legislation -- Europe Union countries -- Cases. Equality before the law -- European Union countries -- Cases. |
- 서비스 이용안내
-
택배대출 신청
청구기호 프린터 선택
| No. | 등록번호 | 청구기호 | 소장처 | 도서상태 | 반납예정일 | 예약 | 서비스 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WM3133 | 341.2422 H946i | 인권도서관/인권도서관/ | 대출가능 |
|
||
| 2 | WM3134 | 341.2422 H946i c.2 | 인권도서관/인권도서관/ | 대출가능 |
|
목차 일부
PART ONE: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND =1
A. SUBJECT AND METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY =3
I. ON THE SUBJECT =3
II. ON METHOD =11
B. PARAMETERS =15
I. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS =15
II. EQUALITY =1...
A. SUBJECT AND METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY =3
I. ON THE SUBJECT =3
II. ON METHOD =11
B. PARAMETERS =15
I. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS =15
II. EQUALITY =1...
목차 전체
PART ONE: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND =1
A. SUBJECT AND METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY =3
I. ON THE SUBJECT =3
II. ON METHOD =11
B. PARAMETERS =15
I. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS =15
II. EQUALITY =17
III. DISCRIMINATION =40
IV. RESTRICTIONS IN A WIDER SENSE =75
V. WHAT IS AN EQUALITY OR NON-DISCRIMINATION RULE FOR THE PRESENT PURPOSES? =77
VI. SUMMARY OF THE MOST IMPORTANT POINTS =85
C. HISTORICAL PRECURSORS OF THE CONCEPT OF INDIRECT DISCRIMINATION =89
I. HISTORIC ORIGINS IN PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW =89
II. THE DISPARATE IMPACT DOCTRINE IN U.S. LAW =91
III. EUROPEAN PRECURSORS: UK AND IRISH LAW =95
IV. THE FIRST EXPLICIT REFERENCE IN THE LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES: GEITLING =96
PART TWO: THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LEGAL CONCEPT OF INDIRECT DISCRIMINATION IN EC LAW =99
A. THE DEVELOPMENT THROUGH CASE LAW =101
I. RECOGNITION OF THE POSSIBILITY THAT DISCRIMINATION CAN BE OF AN INDIRECT NATURE =101
II. OBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION =183
III. SOME BASIC OVERALL FINDINGS =205
IV. ISSUES FOR DEBATE ARISING FROM THE CASE LAW DEFINITION =214
B. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LEGAL DEFINITIONS =279
I. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS =279
II. CODIFICATION: THE BURDEN OF PROOF DIRECTIVE (SEX DISCRIMINATION) =280
III. A NEW GENERATION =284
IV. COMPARISON AND FINDINGS =296
PART THREE: DEMARCATIONS =305
A. DIRECT AND INDIRECT DISCRIMINATION =307
I. PRELIMINARY REMARKS =307
II. DEMARCATION ON THE CONCEPTUAL LEVEL =307
III. APPLYING THE CONCEPTS IN CONCRETE CASES =333
IV. OVERALL CONCLUSION: A RATHER UNCLEAR DIVIDING LINE =368
B. INDIRECT DISCRIMINATION AND RESTRICTIONS IN A WIDER SENSE =371
I. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS: APPROACHING A VAGUE DIVIDING LINE =371
II. WHY A NEW APPROACH? =372
III. ON THE CONCEPTUAL LEVEL: IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IN EFFECT? =389
IV. ASSESSING CONCRETE CASES =397
V. OVERALL CONCLUSION: A VERY VAGUE DIVIDING LINE =417
C. DO WE STILL NEED THE CONCEPT OF INDIRECT DISCRIMINATION? =419
I. RECALLING THE STARTING POINT AND THE MAIN FINDINGS =419
II. WHAT APPROACH FOR THE FUTURE? =421
TABLES =437
A. SUBJECT AND METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY =3
I. ON THE SUBJECT =3
II. ON METHOD =11
B. PARAMETERS =15
I. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS =15
II. EQUALITY =17
III. DISCRIMINATION =40
IV. RESTRICTIONS IN A WIDER SENSE =75
V. WHAT IS AN EQUALITY OR NON-DISCRIMINATION RULE FOR THE PRESENT PURPOSES? =77
VI. SUMMARY OF THE MOST IMPORTANT POINTS =85
C. HISTORICAL PRECURSORS OF THE CONCEPT OF INDIRECT DISCRIMINATION =89
I. HISTORIC ORIGINS IN PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW =89
II. THE DISPARATE IMPACT DOCTRINE IN U.S. LAW =91
III. EUROPEAN PRECURSORS: UK AND IRISH LAW =95
IV. THE FIRST EXPLICIT REFERENCE IN THE LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES: GEITLING =96
PART TWO: THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LEGAL CONCEPT OF INDIRECT DISCRIMINATION IN EC LAW =99
A. THE DEVELOPMENT THROUGH CASE LAW =101
I. RECOGNITION OF THE POSSIBILITY THAT DISCRIMINATION CAN BE OF AN INDIRECT NATURE =101
II. OBJECTIVE JUSTIFICATION =183
III. SOME BASIC OVERALL FINDINGS =205
IV. ISSUES FOR DEBATE ARISING FROM THE CASE LAW DEFINITION =214
B. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LEGAL DEFINITIONS =279
I. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS =279
II. CODIFICATION: THE BURDEN OF PROOF DIRECTIVE (SEX DISCRIMINATION) =280
III. A NEW GENERATION =284
IV. COMPARISON AND FINDINGS =296
PART THREE: DEMARCATIONS =305
A. DIRECT AND INDIRECT DISCRIMINATION =307
I. PRELIMINARY REMARKS =307
II. DEMARCATION ON THE CONCEPTUAL LEVEL =307
III. APPLYING THE CONCEPTS IN CONCRETE CASES =333
IV. OVERALL CONCLUSION: A RATHER UNCLEAR DIVIDING LINE =368
B. INDIRECT DISCRIMINATION AND RESTRICTIONS IN A WIDER SENSE =371
I. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS: APPROACHING A VAGUE DIVIDING LINE =371
II. WHY A NEW APPROACH? =372
III. ON THE CONCEPTUAL LEVEL: IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IN EFFECT? =389
IV. ASSESSING CONCRETE CASES =397
V. OVERALL CONCLUSION: A VERY VAGUE DIVIDING LINE =417
C. DO WE STILL NEED THE CONCEPT OF INDIRECT DISCRIMINATION? =419
I. RECALLING THE STARTING POINT AND THE MAIN FINDINGS =419
II. WHAT APPROACH FOR THE FUTURE? =421
TABLES =437
-
- 온전히 평등하고 지극히 차별적인 : 몸을 위한 변론
- 김원영
- 문학동네, 2024
-
- 우리가 우리를 우리라고 부를 때 : N번방 추적기와 ...
- 추적단 불꽃
- 이봄, 2020
-
- 사회복지 인권강사양성과정 :전문과정
- 대구광역시사회복지협의회
- 대구광역시사회복지협의회, 2018
-
- 페미니즘의 도전 /
- 정희진 지음
- 교양인,, 2005
-
- 부러진 사다리 :불평등은 어떻게 나를 조종하는가?
- Payne, Keith
- 와이즈베리, 2017
서평 (0 건)
*주제와 무관한 내용의 서평은 삭제될 수 있습니다.
서평추가