1. Introduction
I. BACKGROUND = 9
II. WORKING METHODS = 9
III.POINTS OF TERMINOLOGY = 10
IV.ASSESSING ASSESSMENT METHODS = 12
V. RESULTS = 13
2. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CRITERIA GOVERNING THE GRANTING OF ALLOWANCES AND PERSONAL ASSISTANCE = 25
I. INTRODUCTION = 27
II. REPORT = 27
III. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE WORK = 44
3. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CRITERIA GOVERNING THE GRANTING OF DISABILITY/INVALIDITY PENSIONS = 47
4. EUROPEAN DISABILITY BAREMAS = 71
I. ENGLISH BAREMA = 73
II. BELGIAN OFFICIAL DISABILITY RATING SCALE = 75
III.OFFICIAL BELGIAN BAREMA = 78
IV.BAREMA GUIDE FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPAIRMENTS AND INCAPACITIES OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES = 82
V. FRENCH BAREMA = 90
VI.ITALIAN BAREMA = 94
VII.ITALIAN BAREMA : NEW DISABILITY TABLE = 111
VIII.GERMAN BAREMA = 114
IX. ICELANDIC BAREMA = 121
X. PERCENTAGE OF DISABILITY IN CERTAIN PATHOLOGIES = 123
XI. COMPARISON OF DISABILITY BAREMAS IN DENMARK, NORWAY, AND SWEDEN = 129
XII. COMPARISON OF DISABILITY BAREMAS IN BELGIUM, ENGLAND, FRNCE, GERMANY, ICELAND AND ITALY = 132
XIII.CONCLUSIONS = 133
5. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE TYPOLOGY OF ASSESSMENT CRITERIA UESD FOR THE ALLOCATION OF BENEFITS IN CASH AND IN KIND TO PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES = 135
I. FOREWORD = 137
II.COUNTRY BY COUNTRY ANALYSIS = 140
III. CONCLUSIONS = 154
Appendix : Members of the working group = 157
I. BACKGROUND = 9
II. WORKING METHODS = 9
III.POINTS OF TERMINOLOGY = 10
IV.ASSESSING ASSESSMENT METHODS = 12
V. RESULTS = 13
2. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CRITERIA GOVERNING THE GRANTING OF ALLOWANCES AND PERSONAL ASSISTANCE = 25
I. INTRODUCTION = 27
II. REPORT = 27
III. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE WORK = 44
3. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CRITERIA GOVERNING THE GRANTING OF DISABILITY/INVALIDITY PENSIONS = 47
4. EUROPEAN DISABILITY BAREMAS = 71
I. ENGLISH BAREMA = 73
II. BELGIAN OFFICIAL DISABILITY RATING SCALE = 75
III.OFFICIAL BELGIAN BAREMA = 78
IV.BAREMA GUIDE FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPAIRMENTS AND INCAPACITIES OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES = 82
V. FRENCH BAREMA = 90
VI.ITALIAN BAREMA = 94
VII.ITALIAN BAREMA : NEW DISABILITY TABLE = 111
VIII.GERMAN BAREMA = 114
IX. ICELANDIC BAREMA = 121
X. PERCENTAGE OF DISABILITY IN CERTAIN PATHOLOGIES = 123
XI. COMPARISON OF DISABILITY BAREMAS IN DENMARK, NORWAY, AND SWEDEN = 129
XII. COMPARISON OF DISABILITY BAREMAS IN BELGIUM, ENGLAND, FRNCE, GERMANY, ICELAND AND ITALY = 132
XIII.CONCLUSIONS = 133
5. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE TYPOLOGY OF ASSESSMENT CRITERIA UESD FOR THE ALLOCATION OF BENEFITS IN CASH AND IN KIND TO PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES = 135
I. FOREWORD = 137
II.COUNTRY BY COUNTRY ANALYSIS = 140
III. CONCLUSIONS = 154
Appendix : Members of the working group = 157