Kleijkamp, Gerda A
자료유형 | 단행본 |
---|---|
개인저자 | Kleijkamp, Gerda A. |
서명/저자사항 | Family life and family interests :a comparative study of the influence of the European Convention of Human Rights on Dutch family law and the influence of the United States Constitution on American family law:by Gerda A. Kleijkamp. |
발행사항 | The Hague;Boston :Kluwer Law International,1999. |
형태사항 | xi, 409p ;24cm. |
ISBN | 9041111360 |
서지주기 | Includes bibliographical references (p. 369-380) and index. |
내용주기 | Acknowledgements 14 Abbreviations "' Introduction 1 Approachâ Part One The European Convention and the United State 1. The European Convention on Human Rights 13 1. Background: 13 2. Institutions and procedures'14 3. Status in National Systems 18 3.1. Monist system 19 3.2. Dualist system 22 3.3. The united states 24 3.4. The European Union 25 4. Interpretation of Articles8 and 14 26 4.1. Section1:'FamilyLife'28 42. Section2: The limitation clause 4l 4.3. Positive Obligations and Direct Applicability 4.4. Margin of Appreciation 48 4.5, Article14Anti-Discnminatlon 52 2. The United states constitution 57 1. Introduction 57 2. The Framing of the Constitution:' We the people . : 3. The United States supreme court 61 4. Judicial Review 65 4.1. Development of Judicial Review in Europe 68 5. Interpretation and Application of the Due process and Equal Protection clauses 70 5.1. Standards of Review 72 5.2. Direct Applicability and Affirmative Obligations 5.3. Procedural and Substantive Due Process 76 5.4. The Fundamental Right of Privacy 79 5.5. Equal Protection 87 5.6. Aspects of family interests 89 3. Comparative Analysis and Conclusions of part One 1 1. Introduction 103 * SCAN0003.PCX * 2. The Court Systems under the Convention and the Constitution 105 3. Judicial Review 107 4. Interpretation and Application of Respect for Family Life, Due Process and Equal Protection 109 4.1. Standards of Review 110 4.2. Direct Applicability and Affirmative Obligations 113 4.3. Equal Protection/Anti-Discrimination 119 4.4.'FamilyLife'and'farnilylnterests'122 Part Two Dutch and American Family Law Issues 4. Dutch filiations law 137 Introduction 137 1.1. Influence of the European Convention 139 1.2. Focusing on Filiations law 151 2. Filiations 153 2.1. Legal status of children 155 2.2. Legal Filiations: the Mother 159 2.3. Legal Filiations: the Father 160 2.4. Can a Man Establish a Legal Parent-Child Relationship Without the Mother's consent? 163 2.5. Is it Possible to Establish Paternity Without the Father's Consent? 173 2.6. Artificial Insemination and the Establishment of Legal Parent-Child Relationships 178 2.7. Who Qualifies to Establish a Legal Parent-Child Relationship A married Father? A Social or De Facto Father? 182 2.8. Who May Bring an Action to Declare the Non-Paternity of a Child Born During Marriage? 188 5. American Filiations law 201 1. Introduction 201 1.1.'Diversity Jurisdictionâ and theâ Domestic Relations Exception'202 1.2.'Federalization'and'Nationalization'of Family Law 203 1.3. Focusing on California, New York and Texas 207 2. Filiation 209 2.1, Legal status of children 209 2.2. Legal Filiation: the Mother 213 2.3. Legal Filiation: the Father 215 2.4. Can a Man Establish a Legal Parent-Child Relationship Without the Mother's consent? 216 2.5. Is it Possible to Establish Paternity Without the Father's Consent? 243 2.6. Artificial Insemination and the Establishment of Legal Parent-Child Relationships 256 2.7. Who Qualifies to Establish a Legal Parent-Child Relationship a Married Father? A 'Social' or De Facto' Father? 261 2.8. Who May Bring an Action to Declare the Non-Paternity? of a Child Born During Marriage? 275 6. Comparative Analysis and Conclusions of Part Two 293 1. Introduction 293 1.1. CiviILaw-CommonLaw 294 2. Filiation 298 2.1. Can a Man Establish a Legal Parent-Child Relationship Without the Mother's consent? 305 2.2. Is it Possible to Establish Paternity Without the Father Consent? 314 2.3 Artificial Insemination and the Establishment of Legal Parent-Child Relationships 319 2.4. Who Qualifies to Establish a Legal Parent-Child Relationship A Married Father? A 'Social' or 'De Facto' Father? 322 2.5. Who May Bring an Action to Declare the Non-Paternity of a Child Born During Marriage? 326 3. 'Closing Arguments'333. Part Three Influence: Compliance and Comparative Conclusions 7, Compliance of Dutch Filiation Law with the European Convention and of California, New York and Texas Filiation Law with the United states constitution 339 1. Introduction 339 2. Application and Interpretation of the European Convention and The united states constitution 340 2.1. Application 340 2.2. Interpretation 341 3. Compliance with the European Convention 342 4. Compliance with the United States Constitution 345 4.1. California 345 42. Newyork 347 4.3. Texas 349 5. Conclusion 351 8. Comparative Analysis and Conclusions Regarding the Influence of the European Convention on Dutch Family Law and the Influence of the United States Constitution on Family Law, and on Filiation Law in particular, in California, New York and Texas .355 1.Introduction 355 2. Compliance 357 3. Balancing of interests Deserving Protection 358 3.1.'FamilyLife'and'Liberty'Interest 358 3.2. Balancing low 3.3 Conclusion 362 3.4 Other Interests 363 4. Concluding Comparative Remarks 366 4.1. 'Principles of Family Law' 366 Bibliography 369 Table of Cases 381 Index 397 |
주제명(통일서명) | Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms(1950) |
일반주제명 | Domestic relations -- United States Domestic relations -- Netherlands |
서평 (0 건)
*주제와 무관한 내용의 서평은 삭제될 수 있습니다.
서평추가